An Inside Out perspective

Tracking down the presentations from last weeks Intranet 2.0 Forum in Zürich I also checked out the blog (called Inside out) of Richard Dennison, Intranet and Channel Strategy Manager at British Telecom, which I can easily recommend – a blog with a tag line as his must be good (see for yourself, please).

I particularly enjoyed his article “Five reasons not to let social media tools onto your intranet“, which dissects common contrarian attitudes towards social software in the enterprise (mostly by providing pointers to other pragmatic pieces in the same blog). Even when I don’t buy into all of his ideas and concepts I’m subscribed and look forward to more insights like these from the BT organism.

Killing the Org Chart and Enterprise 2.0 Reality Check @ Web 2.0 Expo

Some notes (with added thoughts and remarks from me) on Sören Stamers and Nicole Duffts session at Web 2.0 Expo in Berlin, Sören starts:

Self-organization moves the world (emergence, natural enterprise, complex systems theory, …)

But hierarchy controls the enterprise – why?

Hierarchies are vastly successful (military, church, mafia, …), but
– they kill creativity (which thrives on the edge, see Stowe Boyd)
– they kill agility
and
– they kill motivation (people don’t like to be told what to do, at least the people we want to have in our organizations)

So what’s the situation?
1. Rising complexity
2. Accelerating dynamics (and yes, not only in this web 2.0 world, think of accelerating product lifecycles)
3. Stronger Values (networks tend to create a sense of value, they evolve into higher levels of understanding, again here’s the emergence of patterns)

Three years ago CoreMedia was sensing the need for new approaches, to let go, to get the best of their (capable) people. Here’s how they approached this, they let go the old understanding of departments and rigid organizational structure:

– Get rid of departments, work in projects (so it gets easier to include external people into the work processes

– Transparency doesn’t hurt (open board/management meetings, this creates trust)

– Using Open Space meetings as an organizational method

– Collective awareness beats processes (big changes get easy when you have a global, shared understanding)

– Tools, yes, tools are important (they change the behaviour of people, again see Stowe Boyd) and yes, those web 2.0 tools are a really good afterburner. Sören cites Twitter as an example, but also showed us screenshots of the internal CoreMedia blogging platform), CoreMedia seems to be an interesting company to work for or to do projects with …

Next up is Nicole Dufft of Berlecon Research (Berlin, Germany) speaking about Reality Check: Enterprise 2.0 in Germany

– recently had a study among CEOs et al.
– focussed on knowledge-intensive industries

Some findings:

– a quarter of decision makers in KM-intensive industries do not know what Web 2.0 is
– of those who know, only a smart part know what to do about it
– 90% sees there’s a change going on, that requirements have increased (they sense that things are shifting
– less than half see they are good supported by their ITC team (surprise …)

All in all, web 2.0 ideas haven’t arrived yet. Those who should don’t use the tools, while there’s some scattered use now and then, there’s pretty little use on a company scale.

And really important: People asked do not recognise the benefits of Enterprise 2.0 (yet, these will only be really visible when these tools get used in an integrated, enterprise scale way)

Some Learnings
– Integrated E 2.0 solutions will have to replace insular tools
– Enterprise 2.0 will change the way we companies collaborate, exchange knowledge and ideas
– We as consultants must work hard to explain the benefits, to show them the usage etc.

Closing there was a round of statements and questions from the audience, all things that are bothering them:

– projects not working as wished
– we’re working in small teams, but they seem to don’t work well together
– we’re suffering from bad motivation among our employees – they seem to be too content
– we sense that we could be more innovative, but don’t know how to proceed
– we are a big organization, how can we kill the hierarchy (Sören says that one way may be a meritocracy, someone from the audience: make flat project teams, you need to network and build these small teams, this is a good idea even for big enterprises)
– listening is sometimes the bottle-neck, it is easy to make them write blogposts, but it’s hard to listen and act upon the things read (Sören offers a good idea: support the formation of weak ties in the organization, e.g. by having rounds of bilateral talks in the organization, whereby you create conversations and change the organization in the course of talking)

This was a good session, I enjoyed the audience participation and the presenters way of going on about this, Frank and Oliver did some liveblogging too, so I will link to their posts shortly.

Web 2.0 is gaining traction in the corporate world …

is this really reality? Now, I’ve been collecting and compiling some serious stuff on Enterprise 2.0 and Web 2.0 adoption lately, some of them are worth pointing out … especially given a discussion I’ve had lately and that was revitalized today.

There’s this HBS Case on How Wikipedia Works (or Doesn’t) and the related discussion (“Wikipedia in Pinstripes”), that handles a lot of the adoption challenges social software has in the enterprise:

[…] Wiki is another experiment in how to generate more collaboration inside companies, but I’ve seen mixed results. It can be as simple as “We’re having an office party, please sign up on a wiki page, and tell us what you’re going to bring,” to “We’re going to run this project, bring in all your knowledge assets together, and then we can self-organize.”

What Wikipedia has shown is that self-selection is critical. Peer review is critical. So there is a challenge for firms that are used to managing employees and allocating the resources in a very top-down kind of way. Now we have a technology that enables self-selection, transparency, openness—how does a manager or management deal with the technology? Do they implement it in a way that’s true to the spirit, or is it top-down? And, again, there are some very successful examples and some not so successful examples.

Some crossposts from my other blog …

Lately blog readership of this blog has taken up – yet, I suspect that some of you don’t know that there’s a sister blog on business model innovation and design (BMID) that I am writing too, and that sometimes stuff is blogged there that’s related or touching on Enterprise 2.0, Web 2.0 or Social Software. So here you go, in reverse chronological order:

Social Networks and Organizational Pathologies …

What’s the attraction in Facebook?

Make innovation a truly open and collaborative process

Marketinginstrument Community – Wie können Marken den Nutzer beeinflussen?

Portable soziale Netzwerke

Noserub @ Barcamp München Tag 2

MIT Sloan Business Insight, with a link to an interesting article (How can companies build organizational networks that encourage innovation?)

Jumpstarting innovation (and how to leverage collaboration …)

Technology, Innovation and Organization (for complex organizational settings)

Leitfaden zum Thema Web 2.0 & E-Commerce

The Impact of Web 2.0 and Emerging Social Network Models

Designing for Flexibility

e-Collaboration Forum 2007

Heute und morgen findet in Frankfurt das zweite e-Collaboration Forum 2007 statt.

Um den gestiegenen Anforderungen der Informationswirtschaft gerecht zu werden, reicht es nicht mehr aus die Mitarbeiter mit E-Mail und Kalender zu versorgen. Es gilt sich neu zu orientieren und die Voraussetzung für den „Collaborative Workplace“ zu schaffen. […] wie man durch eCollaboration unternehmensweite Arbeitsprozesse fördern kann sowie über Unternehmensgrenzen hinweg Geschäftsprozesse und den Informationsaustausch optimieren kann.

Der Einsatz von Social Software wie bspw. Weblogs, Wikis, Social Networking Plattformen etc. für unternehmensübergreifende Prozesse, bspw. im Rahmen von Open Innovation, ist ein Thema, das zunehmend an Fahrt gewinnt.

Ich habe zu diesem Thema eine weitere Präsentation ausgearbeitet (“Facebook, Twitter und Co. – Infrastruktur für E-Collaboration?“), die ich (in einer dann aktualisierten und überarbeiteten Fassung ) am BarCamp Berlin in einer Session verwenden möchte. Feedback und Kommentare sind sehr willkommen!

Die strategische Bedeutung von Wikis für Unternehmen …

… ist Thema einer Veranstaltung der deutschen Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e.V. am 16. Oktober in Ulm: Wiki Wirtschaft – Die strategische Bedeutung von Wikis für Unternehmen:

Aus der Ankündigung:

[…] Wiki Wirtschaft will zeigen, dass es sich um eine Veränderung in der Kommunikation, ein strategisches Modell handelt und wie Unternehmen davon profitieren können.

Wer mich an diesem Abend in Ulm, um Ulm oder um Ulm herum treffen möchte – hier oder hier kann man mich erreichen.

Update: Via Cedric gesehen: Der Referent Alexander Kornegger führt auch ein Blog. Ich hoffe ja nicht, dass das ein reines Spezialistentreffen sein wird, sondern würde mich besonders über Wiki-Neugierige (oder sogar Wiki-Skeptiker) freuen!