Buzzing beim WikiWednesday Stuttgart

Tja, das war eigentlich abzusehen – der neunte WikiWednesday in Stuttgart ging nicht ohne Verluste über die Bühne. Konkret haben wir einen alten Hasen mit der kurzfristigen Ortsänderung – und trotz Umleitungsschildern – verloren in die Irre geführt. Sorry Dirk – tut uns leid. Du hast viel verpasst, das war gestern ein sehr spannendes und gut besuchtes Meeting. Danke an alle Anwesenden und Mitgestalter!

Wiki Wednesday Stuttgart

Zuerst aber ein großer Dank an den Coworking Space Stuttgart, der uns gestern einen Raum, Beamer und auch alles andere zur Verfügung gestellt hat (Kekse!). Bei Flickr gibt es einige Fotos von der Veranstaltung, da sieht man auch dass es schöne Seminarräume im CoWorking Space hat (hint!). Mehrere der Bilder wurden schon während der Veranstaltung bei Google Buzz gepostet – dem Mittelpunkt unserer Diskussion gestern abend.

Unsere Agenda war ja vielfältig – kein Wunder, bereits in der Vergangenheit haben wir immer wieder die Zukunft der Zusammenarbeit und der Wissensarbeit diskutiert. Buzz ist hier (wie auch Wave) nur ein weiterer Schritt in eine Welt in der das Wort Wiki mehr als Verb, denn als Pronomen verwendet wird …

Entsprechend haben wir gestern abend eine Tour durch Buzz unternommen, inklusive Tipps und Tricks:

Daneben haben wir auch einige Ideen für das WikiCAMP am 6. März 2010 bei der CeBIT gesammelt – diese trage ich noch zusammen und stelle sie dann im Mixxt-Wiki ein …

Heute: CoWorking Wiki Wednesday

Schon lange angekündigt – aber nun doch mit einer kurzfristigen Raumänderung. Heute abend ist der neunte WikiWednesday in Stuttgart.

Wiki Wednesday Stuttgart

Anders als zuletzt aber nicht in den Räumen der MFG Innovationsagentur, sondern im neu eröffneten CoWorking Stuttgart Space im Gründerzentrum H7 in Stuttgart-Stadtmitte.

Der Hintergrund ist, dass diese Woche die “Alpha”-Phase des Coworking Space Stuttgart begonnen hat – dieses Projekt ist spannend und kann mehr Sichtbarkeit vertragen (“Was ist Coworking?“).

Insofern würden wir uns heute einmal dort “einquartieren” – und gemeinsam über die Zukunft der Zusammenarbeit diskutieren. Andere geplante und vorbereitete Themen sind u.a.

Wer also Interesse hat ist herzlich willkommen – ab 18:00 ist Get-together, ab 19:00 Beginn des eigentlichen Schaffens.

Hier die Wegbeschreibung:

“Die CoWorking Stuttgart Räume sind im H7 – gegenüber vom Hauptbahnhof – […] im Gründerzentrum H7, in der zweiten Etage. Wenn ihr durch den Haupteingang reinkommt, geht ihr am Empfang vorbei die Treppe hinten rechts hoch und dann in der zweiten Etage durch die Schwingtür und schräg über die Galerie durch die Stahltür”

Zur Sicherheit würde ich heute abend aber auch Hinweisschilder und “Wegweiser” anbringen …

Google buzz and the fabric of the social web

“In other words, standards — and in particular social web standards — are the lingua franca that make it possible for uninitiated web services to interact in a consistent manner. When web services use standards to commoditize essential and basic features, it forces them to compete not with user lock-in, but by providing better service, better user experience, or with new functionality and utility. I am an advocate of the open web because I believe the open web leads to increased competition, which in turn affords people better options, and more leverage in the world.”

Says Chris – oh yes, and this must be only the beginning, right? See epeus.blogspot.com – I am crossposting this here now from posterous – now that our vision of buzz is getting clearer, and me and fellow buzzards need some more “argumentative fuel”.

Thoughts on using Google Buzz for collaboration and knowledge work

Ah, all the buzz about Google Buzz. Everybody is kicking the tires, experimenting and playfully learning. This is fun – at least for geeks and I can say that the overall experience has been pretty cool. It’s slick, has seen some very good ideas implemented and integrates nicely with my (private) Google account. Some feature requests and some questions still remain, and right – mine are not so much focussed on the consumer experience side but rather on the side of collaboration and knowledge worker’s processes. So no thoughts on mobile usage of Buzz now, nor about usability, complexity or design and only a smallish thought on adoption near the end of this post.

One – I am really waiting for the Buzz to arrive in my Google Apps domain (mail to frogpond adresses is handled by Google Mail, yes, there are a lot reasons for putting mail and apps into the cloud) – and the official announcement wasn’t clear I think:

We also plan to make Google Buzz available to businesses and schools using Google Apps, with added features for sharing within organizations.

Hmm, does this include the standard edition of Apps or is this planned for Premium alone?

Two – let’s applaud Google for relying on open communication standards for its social web endeavours – it’s playing, integrating and – as Chris Messina writes here – leveraging the fabric of the open web. Of course this is helping Google but it’s also helping us, and it’s a wildly disruptive move too (hey, everything that uses Pubsubhubbub is a friend of mine …).

Three – Right, Buzz both validates and marginalizes Friendfeed (I so dig the tag line “FriendFeed Reborn. On Growth Hormone” at Techcrunch). Indeed, the idea of an aggregated life-workstream was just too good to go unsatisfied – and I am now waiting for rooms and/or persistent searches to find their ways into Buzz.

Knowledge workers they need to arrange their groups and channels of communication, finding information from sources that are contextually relevant (and then act upon them, sometimes this may just mean more information filtering, analysis and refining et al.). All in all the knowledge workers workplace can need some more nifty tools that improve productivity – and yes, this is a big topic in Vulcan too everywhere.

Four – Commencing on the context topic of three, what Buzz already has done for me is a boosting of the volume (and so far the usefulness) of Google Reader recommendations. I really like the pre-filtered stuff that gets channeled to me through my social network (and I hope they enjoy the stuff I am recommending and bookmarking on a daily basis).

And now there’s more of it – and it’s easy to “buzzify content” that may start a discussion on Buzz. So I guess we need some more Backtype wizardry to include the Buzz discourse on blogs. That said – we’re still missing threaded conversation, individual favoriting of comments et al. in Buzz. Until that arrives I would rather have the conversation and discourse in here, yet I am not sure how this will work out in the end. But yes, I see and I like that Buzz will allow for more finetuning, filtering and finding stuff that interests me.

Let’s assume then that the adoption rolls in the enterprise sphere too? That’s asking for much now (and let’s not forget that these are beta status thougts …). One reason is that Google is not exactly in the position to enter the large enterprises market, even taking into account the considerable amount of consumerization of corporate IT and collaboration instruments. But I am sure that collaboration systems that merge IM, mail, wiki style collaborative editing, content sharing and communication will succeed in the enterprise too.

So yes, I think they can mount the 9x challenge – Susan asked here whether Buzz can overcome Andrew McAfee’s famous test – and I commented that it’s the integration with Google Mail that helps Buzz access a huge initial user base and network, of which:

[…] some may use it at times, even when it’s not 9 times better than the other ways we communicate

From this initial user base I guess it’s a downhill battle …

So yes, and to sum it up – for now Buzz may be immature, but it has lots of promise to change the way people collaborate and communicate.

PS. I know this could as well been a BMID post – as Buzz pondering touches and meanders around the cultures of innovation, the nerve and resilience to pull through with your innovation and ideas (some have fears Google may not), all in all the excitement and the wonders of technology innovation. And it’s relevant from a business model innovation perspective too, I feel a bit so …

Upcoming: WikiCAMP at CeBIT 2010

Mark the date and arrange your travel plans wisely – on March 6, 2010 we’ll have the first WikiCamp at CeBIT

wikicamp_logo_500

The venue is in Hall 6 at the FORUM Learning & Knowledge Solutions, nearby the Webciety area. There will be some smaller rooms for workshops and small group discussions – plus a large general meeting area where lightning talks, interviews and the closing session is planned. Add your session proposals now.

Here’s the planned schedule:

10:00 – 11:40 Opening, Meet ‘n Greet, Plan for sessions
11:40 – 12:25 First sessions
12:30 – 13:15 Open for sessions (or lunch if you’re hungry)
13:20 – 14:05 Timeslot 3 – plus one session in the forum
14:10 – 14:55 Timeslot 4 – plus one session in the forum
15:00 – 16:30 Closing it up – what have we discussed and what have we learned

Es geht los – CoWorking in Stuttgart

Genug des Redens, seit dieser Woche wird gebuzzt geschafft im Beehive Stuttgart CoWorking Space Stuttgart der Name steht noch nicht fest – aber ich bin mir mittlerweile nicht mehr sicher ob die Buzz-Metapher noch sinnvoll ist …

Bis Anfang März, wenn wir die offizielle Eröffnung planen, möchten wir Euch die Gelegenheit bieten, die Alpha-Phase des Coworking Stuttgart mitzuerleben und zu gestalten und – warum nicht – an eigenen Projekten zu arbeiten! Auch wenn nicht gleich am 15.02. die ganze Infrastruktur vorhanden sein wird, sondern erstmal nur Tische, Stühle, Internet und Kaffee 😉 laden wir euch herzlich ein, zwischen dem 15.02. und 28.02. im Rahmen unserer Coworking Test Days, eure Projekte und Laptops mitzubringen und Coworking gratis zu erleben!

CoWorking Test Days? Am Rosenmontag werde ich meine Arbeit (Laptop) und einen Kuchen einpacken und zur inoffiziellen Einweihung da sein, ich freue mich darauf …

What builds Community Strength

But if communities are so much a part of humanity, why do many fail? There are more communities available to us than we are able to join. We filter those we don’t have affinity to.  We are stretched too thin and cannot be at every party — and give each one our gifts.  We run out of time, energy, and willingness to participate.  So we choose our attachments. If only we understood how.

Communities require emotional attachments that makes them communities — they (usually via their leaders) must develop a sense of Shared Fate.  Shared fate means that if something happens to the community, then each member feels affected by it.

… and then there’s shared faith which is essential in community building and “nourishing”.

Gil Yehuda cites open source development projects, which can (sometimes) lead to extraordinary results, and goes on to talk about in-house community building and the steps it takes.

This is a great post and an equally inspiring discussion – touching actual community management, the dynamics of communities (of practice), why we need to foster them (resilience, collaboration, motivation only being some of the points) and the design and patterns that underly them. These sort of communities, ie. communities that share fate and faith, are what makes work and workplaces meaningful (and sometimes enjoyable) …

PS. Yes, I am writing this on an Ubuntu-powered GNU Linux machine, in Firefox, and this post will get published on an Apache powered Linux webserver again, so much on what communities can achieve.

Extended blog post based upon a posterous entry.